Grand Rounds Recap 9.4.19
/MSK Ultrasound - QI/KT: hypothermia - Critical Care: shock - R4 Case Follow Up - R1 Clinical Diagnostics: HINTS EXAM - CPC: osteomyelitis
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound WITH DR. STOLZ
Shoulder
Normal anatomy
The glenoid and scapula should both be visualized at the level of the glenoid notch with the humeral head in the center of the screen
Shoulder dislocation
Ultrasound can be used in real time after a reduction as opposed to waiting for an x-ray
Shoulder effusion
Appears as hypoechoic material around the humeral head
Injection/arthrocentesis
Use an in plane technique and insert the needle laterally
AC joint assessment
Normal distance is 2-3 mm, and 6 mm is considered a separation
Biceps tendon pathology
Place the patient’s arm in a neutral position with the elbow flexed and palm facing up
Place the probe in the bicipital groove to look for the anisotropic tendon
Knee
Position the patient’s knee in slight flexion and use the linear probe
Scan from the terminus of the quadriceps tendon down to the insertion of the patellar tendon
The suprapatellar bursa is posterior to the quadriceps tendon and contiguous with the joint - this can be helpful to localize a pocket for arthrocentesis
Ankle
First obtain a longitudinal view on the anterior ankle to assess for an effusion between the distal tibia and talus.
Switch to a transverse view when performing an ankle arthrocentesis and approach from either a medial or lateral approach using an in plane technique
Finally, obtain longitudinal and transverse views on the posterior ankle to assess the Achilles tendon
Immediately anterior to the tendon is Kager’s fat and is useful for identifying the tendon
Posterior acoustic shadowing indicates a tendon rupture
QI/KT: Accidental Hypothermia WITH DRS. CONNELLY AND URBANOWICZ
Physiologic Changes in Hypothermia
Hypothermia initially causes vasoconstriction and atrial tachycardia, but eventually causes bradycardia and ventricular dysrrhythmias
Blood viscosity increases and coagulopathy develops at temperatures less than 32 degrees
Decreased cough and impaired ciliary function of the upper airways puts hypothermic patients at high risk for aspiration
Mental status changes begin at temperatures less than 32 degrees Celsius
As the patient gets colder, brain stem reflexes are lost and can mimic brain death
Hypothermia decreases ADH secretion and initially causes a cold diuresis which can causes significant hypovolemia
Severity of hypothermia
Mild - over 32 degrees
Moderate - 28-32 degrees
Severe - 24-28 degrees
Stability is classified primarily based on the patient’s mental status and vital signs
Rewarming Methods
Stable patients with mild hypothermia (32-35 degrees)
Passive external rewarming
Increase the ambient temperature of the room
Remove wet clothing to prevent further heat losses
Warm, sweet drinks - increases temperature 0.5-4 degrees per hour via shivering
Active movement - increases temperature 1-5 degrees per hour
Moderate hypothermia (28-32 degrees)
Active external rewarming
Chemical heat pack and blankets - use caution as these can cause thermal burns
Bair hugger - increases temperature by 1-3 degrees per hour
Arctic Sun - the evidence is scant for its use in the treatment of hypothermia and only at the level of case reports
Minimally invasive internal rewarming
Warmed IV fluids - studies showed no difference when compared with shivering alone, but recommended mainly because these patients are volume depleted and need crystalloid resuscitation
Warmed humidified oxygen - safe but does not significantly increase rewarming rate. This can cause airway injury when combined with positive pressure ventilation
Bladder irrigation - increases temperature by 0.5-1 degree per hour
Unstable or severe hypothermia (24-28 degrees)
Invasive internal rewarming
Endovascular rewarming
A central venous catheter is inserted and warm saline is infused into the device
Increases temperature by 0.5-2.5 degrees per hour
Extracorporeal rewarming
Continuous arteriovenous rewarming
Arterial and venous catheters remove the patient’s blood which is then warmed using a rapid infuser and placed back into the patient
Dialysis
Both CRRT and iHD have been used
Increases temperature by 1.5-3 degrees per hour
eCLS/ECMO
This method has the most robust amount of data with a 30% mortality difference and better neurologic outcomes
Increases temperature by 4-10 degrees/hr
Recommended in patients who have arrhythmias, SBP <90, respiratory distress, refractory acidosis, or temperature less than 28 degrees
Hypothermic arrest
ECMO
Small study of 13 patients showed significantly increased mortality rates
Contraindications:
Potassium greater than 12
Age greater than 70
Inability to be anticoagulated
Positive FAST exam
HOPE score < 0.10 (see below)
Core body temperature less than 14 degrees
Thoracic cavity lavage
Recommended if ECMO is not available
Highly variable rewarming rate - 1-21 degrees per hour
ACLS medications and defibrillation do not work well at low body temperatures - recommended to only administer 3 rounds until the patient is rewarmed, but CPR should be continued throughout
Outcome Predictions
Serum potassium
Elevated potassium suggests hypoxic death prior to hypothermia
If potassium is greater than 12, further resuscitative efforts should be terminated
HOPE Score
www.hypothermia-score.org for details on how to calculate this if you are considering ECMO in a hypothermic patient
The hypothermia algorithm can be found on tamingthesru.com in the upcoming months!
Shock WITH DR. GORDER
Shock is a profound mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Initially it is reversible but after a certain period of time becomes irreversible and leads to death.
Types of shock
Distributive
Sepsis - 62%
Other - 4%
Inflammatory shock
Appears similar to sepsis but no source is ever found (culture negative)
Severe burns, pancreatitis, air or fat embolism, aspiration
Anaphylaxis
Neurogenic shock
Endocrine shock
Drug or toxin induced (calcium channel and beta blocker overdose)
Liver failure
Cardiogenic - 16%
LV failure
Post MI
Acute valvular insufficiency
Cardiomyopathy
Dynamic LV outflow track obstruction
RV failure
Massive PE
Acute on chronic RV failure
Right sided MI
Cardiac contusion
Sepsis induced cardiomyopathy
Hypovolemic - 16%
Either hemorrhagic or non-hemorrhagic
Obstructive - 2%
Pulmonary embolism
Tension pneumothorax
Cardiac tamponade
Abdominal compartment syndrome
Patients may have as many types of shock as they please - don’t fall into the trap of only recognizing one type and anchoring on this
Recognition of Shock
Systolic blood pressure is representative of the patient’s cardiac output
Dependent on the stroke volume, which is in turn dependent on preload, afterload, and contractility
Diastolic blood pressure is representative of the systemic vascular resistance, or the overall vascular tone
Diastolic blood pressure will change first in distributive shock and cause a wide pulse pressure
Decreased blood pressure is the end pathway in shock, but patients in shock often initially present with normal blood pressure
No single test can diagnose shock - it is a bedside, clinical diagnosis
Start by assessing the patient’s hemodynamics
Look at the patient’s blood pressure in the context of their baseline - normotension may actually be hypotension in a patient with chronic hypertension
Tachycardia
Shock index - HR/SBP
Normal: 0.5-0.7
Several studies have shown that a shock index greater than 1.0 is associated with significantly poorer outcomes
Modified shock index - HR/MAP
Greater than 1.3 or less than 0.7 is a strong indicator for mortality
Tachycardia is the initial physiologic mechanism to increase cardiac output
At extreme rates (>200 bpm) diastolic filling decreases and leads to decreased stroke volume
Rate is usually not the problem - be very cautious with rate control or cardioversion in a tachycardic patient in shock
Low urine output
Every patient in shock should have a foley
Less than 0.5 cc/kg/hr is concerning for renal hypo-perfusion
Perfusion
Touch your patients - take their clothes off, put them in a gown, and look at and feel their legs - you can pick up cardiogenic shock if the patient’s legs are cold or have mottling
Altered mental status
Often profound in septic shock but a very late finding in cardiogenic shock
This is a harbinger of doom in hemorrhagic shock
Agitation is the last neuronal effort before death - do not take this away from the patient unless you are prepared to own their hemodynamics
Lactate
Classically taught as a marker of mismatch between oxygen delivery and demand - this is not true
No studies have shown a relationship between lactate and oxygen delivery
Lactate is a product of epinephrine-stimulated glycolysis - it is a result of aerobic metabolism, not anaerobic metabolism
The initial lactate can be useful in detecting occult shock, but trending lactate as a marker of resuscitation is not very helpful beyond for prognostics
Lactate is much more complicated than we realize, and we are probably not using it correctly
Diagnosis of Shock
History, physical, and chart review can rule out a vast majority of shock
Previous echo, cardiac cath, and EKG
Immunosuppression
Indwelling devices
Recent procedures
Recent medication changes
History of corticosteroid use
Ultrasound
RUSH Exam
This should be considered part of your physical exam for a patient in shock
Assesses cardiac function, valvular insufficiences, and can be a dynamic assessment when applying interventions
Invasive monitoring devices (Swan-Ganz catheter)
Have fallen out of favor
A PA catheter is only helpful if the patient is in truly undifferentiated shock or is in a mixed shock state
SvO2
In theory can tell you if the patient is in high or low output shock
There is a big difference in the SvO2 obtained from a central line and a Swan-Ganz
In the ED, the absolute number is unlikely to be helpful, but trends after interventions can be
Liver function testing
Remember to obtain these - you will often see more profound transaminitis in cardiogenic shock
R4 Case Follow Up WITH DR. BANNING
New onset seizure
Labs are abnormal in 15% of patients but only 1% contributed to making a final diagnosis
Imaging lead to a diagnosis in 10% of patients
Lumbar puncture aided diagnosis in 8% of patients
EKG - 14.2% of patients had some type of repolarization abnormality
Bigeminy
Can be causes by anxiety, sympathomimetics, myocardial ischemia, hyperthyroidism, hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia
Torsades des Pointes
Prolonged repolarization leads to T on P phenomenon, which then causes polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
The most common causes of torsades are QT prolonging medications
Treatment
1-2 g of magnesium over 5-10 minutes
100-200 J cardioversion or defibrillation
1-1.5 mg/kg of lidocaine (preferred over procainamide or amiodarone)
R1 Clinical Diagnostics: The HINTS Exam WITH DR. IJAZ
Please see Dr. Ijaz’s fantastic post for more information on how to perform the HINTS exam, as well as examples of normal and abnormal findings and how to use the exam in your clinical practice in the ED.
Case 1: Vestibular neuritis
Treatment includes a trial of steroids, benzodiazepenes for vestibular suppression, and discharge with close PCP follow up
Case 2: Posterior Circulation Stroke
If you have a high clinical suspicion for a central cause of vertigo, the HINTS exam should not be used and the patient should proceed to definitive imaging / treatment
The NIHSS is often very low in posterior circulation strokes
Non contrast head CT has a poor sensitivity (unless a hemorrhagic stroke is identified)
You should obtain a CTA of the head and neck looking for basilar / PCA occlusion or vertebral dissection +/- a diffusion weighted MRI for non-LVO stroke
Treat this as a stroke with thrombolytics if the patient presents with neurologic deficits within the treatment window, and discuss with your local stroke team to determine if the patient should proceed to thrombectomy or other endovascular treatments
Case 3: Benign Paroxismal Positional Vertigo
The HINTS exam should not be used in cases of obvious BPPV - instead use the Dix-Hallpike maneuver
Treatment includes antihistamines such as meclizine or otolith repostioning maneuvers (Epley maneuver)
CPC WITH DRS. FREDERICK AND SUMMERS
Case: A teenage male presents with right shoulder and left chest pain for the past week. The patient reports that he was bit by a bug and given keflex and developed the shoulder pain after this. The pain is reported as tearing and ripping in a dermatomal distribution on the left chest and right shoulder with associated vomiting and fevers. No PMH, PSH, known allergies, and he is fully immunized.
Physical exam: the patient is ill appearing with dry mucous membranes, tachycardic with a systolic murmur and delayed capillary refill. He is also tachycpneic with diminished breathe sounds over the left base. He has tenderness to palpation along the right biceps tendon and refuses to flex or abduct the right arm above 30 degrees.
He is given a fluid bolus, antibiotics, and tylenol and remains febrile and tachycardic.
His EKG shows sinus tachycardia. Laboratory studies show a potassium of 5.4, sodium of 135 and glucose of 110. He has no leukocytosis, mildly elevated imflammatory markers, normal urinalysis, and normal procalcitonin. He begins to desaturate to the high 80’s.
CXR and right shoulder x-ray are normal.
Bedside echocardiogram performed by cardiology appears hyperdynamic but otherwise is unremarkable. At this point a test is ordered and the diagnosis is made.
Differential Diagnosis
Distributive shock
Sepsis - osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pneumonia, Lyme disease
Inflammatory shock
Endocrine shock - Addisonian crisis, pheochromocytoma, thyrotoxicosis
Cardiogenic
Lower on the differential given normal echocardiogram
Hypovolemic
Less likely with no history of GI losses
Obstructive shock
Pulmonary embolism is less likely in the pediatric population
No pneumothorax or effusion on chest x ray or echocardiogram
Infarction
Sickle cell disease
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency
Neoplasm
Osteosarcoma, ewing sarcoma, nephroblastoma/neuroblastoma with metastasis to lung or bone
Serum sickness like reaction to antibiotics
Autoimmunine
JRA, rheumatic fever, microscopic polyangitis, familial mediterranean fever, lupus
Test: MRI of the shoulder
Diagnosis: Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis of the proximal humerus
Osteomyelitis is twice as common in males
Risk factors include sickle cell anemia, immunodeficiency, and indwelling catheters
1/2 of cases in pediatrics have no risk factors
Microbiogram: staphylococal sp., streptococcal sp., K. kingae, and E. coli
Presentation: constitutional symptoms with focal symptoms around the affected bone
Leukocytosis is only seen in about 36% of pediatric patients
ESR greater than 20 and CRP greater than 10 has a 95% sensitivity but are non-specific markers
X-rays appear normal until symptoms have been present for 10 days or longer
MRI is much more sensitive and specific than plain films
Treatment
Vancomycin for all patients
3rd generation cephalosporin in patients less than 3 months of age
Treatment duration is a minimum of 4 weeks
Surgery is indicated if the bone damage is extensive or the patient does not respond to medical therapy