Grand Rounds Recap 7.10.19
/
Great Debate: Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine WITH DRS. Lang and Plash
Succinylcholine
Onset of action 45-60 seconds, which is comparable to 1.2mg/kg of rocuronium
Duration of action 5-10 minutes
This is beneficial for being able to follow the patient’s neurologic examination
Quick duration of action also benefits allowing patient to auto-regulate respiratory rate to help compensate for an underlying metabolic acidosis
If reversal anticipated, cheaper than sugammadex for reversal of rocuronium
Cochrane Review: succinylcholine had better intubating conditions and faster onset of action than rocuronium, although no change in success rates
Faster desaturation time associated with succinylcholine, but no evidence of significant adverse effects related to this
Reported contraindications to rocuronium:
Carcinomatosis
Neuromuscular disease
Burns
Anticonvulsants
Prolonged QTc
Increased pulmonary vascular resistance
NEAR Database: no difference in intubating success or adverse events between succinylcholine and rocuronium
Rocuronium
On the market in early 1990s
First comparison trial in 1992 by Huizinga et al.
A lot of the results from this study have now been disproven with further research
Dosing: majority of studies including 0.6-0.8 mg/kg; however, higher dosing may be more effective
Per Cochrane Review, there is no significant difference in intubating conditions when higher doses of rocuronium are used
Based on Taha et al. and Tang et al., there is significantly quicker desaturation times with succinylcholine compared to rocuronium
May improve ‘Can’t Intubate Can’t Oxygenate’ (CICO) outcomes with prolonged paralysis, although this is opinion based
Similar time to intubation with appropriate dosing of 1.2 mg/kg
Potential downsides:
Extended duration of paralysis - can’t follow neuro exam, higher likelihood for inappropriate sedation
Neuro patients - is the decision to go to the OR based more on exam or more on CT scan?, rocuronium may decrease hypoxic events based on desaturation data
MasterS Class WITH DRs. Moellman and Ryan
Philosophy
Be aware of the “efficiency ceiling” midway through a shift
Think the worse and prove it wrong
If you think too hard about performing a test, just do it
Balance science vs experience
Document in a timely manner
Pertinent negatives > pertinent positives
Case 1
Young male brought in by EMS strapped down, naked, with a spit mask in place after being found running around with altered mental status
Chemical restraint with haloperidol and midazolam
Work up largely negative, including head CT
Dx: patient’s typical post-ictal phase includes running around naked
On reassessment, the patient was back to his normal mental status and had been post-ictal
Post-ictal psychosis is a true diagnosis, so be sure to think about it on your differential diagnosis with acute changes in mental status
Case 2
Female patient with possible pregnancy who “can’t see”
38 weeks OB, hypertensive, seizing
Dx: eclampsia
Started on oxygen, seizure precautions, labetalol/hydralazine, magnesium, IVF
Talk with OB, neonatal resuscitation team, pharmacy
Know your consultants
Case 3
Male bit in finger by “black-necked spitting cobra”
Crofab is not an option because it is an Elapidae species
No antivenom available in Cincinnati, but available in Kentucky
AirCare dispatched to retrieve antivenom, treated successfully
Know your resources
Case 4
Young male woke up with “eyes hurting”
Conjunctival injection, cylinder hair in conjunctivae with fluorescein staining
Tarantula hairs come loose when it shakes its body, so he had tarantula hairs in his eyes
Must remove manually, inflammation treated with steroid antibiotic drops
Be thorough in your history taking
Case 5
Middle aged male with flank pain, diarrhea, sweating
Labs and CT normal
Ready to be discharged, but family arrived stating this was how he presented with his last heart attack
Dx: Inferior STEMI 2/2 RCA with in-stent stenosis
Ask your patients if they have had similar symptoms before
Case 6
Young male with DD presents with genital pain?
L testicle TTP and swelling without mass
Ultrasound with concern for scrotal cellulitis
Return visit 2 days later with Fournier’s gangrene
Use tools to communicate with patients who are unable
Case 7
Middle age female with “stroke”
Dysarthria, lethargy, glucose normal
In CT, develops respiratory distress
On reassessment, has ACE-inhibitor induced angioedema
In the era of protocolized medicine, be aware of the mimics
Case 8
Young male who “can’t move my legs”
On exam, cannot move his proximal legs
Found to be hypokalemic period paralysis with thyrotoxic cause
Use your lifelines
Document AMAs thoroughly
Pharmacy Update WITH DR. Paige Garber and Nicole Harger
Oral Anticoagulant Reversal
Oral anticoagulation can be beneficial for VTE prophylaxis, as they do not need monitoring or bridging
However, they do require BID dosing which can be be challenging in noncompliant patients
Dabigatran
Poor oral bioavailability
Can be reversed with RRT as it is not protein bound
FFP and activated 4-factor PCC are nonspecific agents for reversal
Idarucizumab is a specific monoclonal antibody that has been approved for reversal
Dosing is 5g IV (two 2.5g boluses within 15 minutes of each other)
Oral Direct Xa Inhibitors (including rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban)
Relatively short half-lives, so important to determine last dose of these medications
Non-activated 4-factor PCC is non-specific
Andexanet alpha binds and inhibits factor Xa drugs to cease activity of anticoagulant drugs but has no specific activity to reverse anticoagulation
No comparative data available between PCC and andexanet alpha
Current recommendations support 4-factor PCC (50 units/kg) but all were published prior to andexanet alpha
ANNEXA-4
Included patients on apixaban, rivaroxaban, and enoxaparin
352 patients with acute major bleed with last dose within 18 hours
Excluded ICH with decreased GCS or volume greater than 60cc and patients with planned surgery
Overall good or excellent hemostasis achieved in 82% of patients
Mean time to bolus was 4.8 hours
Thrombotic events: 18%
Mortality: 15%
Rebound effect of similar anti-factor Xa levels after infusion of drug is completed
Droperidol
Initially formulated in the 1950s
FDA black box warning in 2001 regarding QT prolongation
Shortage in 2012 causing the drug to go absent on the US market
Relaunched in 2019
Mechanisms of action: Butyrophenone antipsychotic
Dopamine blockade
Alpha adrenergic blockage
GABA agonist
Onset 3-10 minutes with peak effect 30 minutes
Duration 2-4 hours
Dosage:
FDA approved for Post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV): 0.625-1.25 mg
Agitation (off-label): 1.25-2.5 mg
Adverse effects
QTc prolongation
Tachydysrhythmia
Contraindicated
QTc > 440 males, > 450 females
Hypersensitivity
Droperidol increases QTc on average 25ms, compared to haloperidol 4.7ms and ziprasidone 21ms
Warning in patients with buproprion, as this lowers the seizure threshold
Doses greater than 1.25 mg require continuous cardiac monitoring
Baseline EKG needed prior to administration, although may not be possible in agitated patients
PONV
Statistically significantly better than metoclopromide
Headaches
2015 American Headache Society guidelines: droperidol class level B
Many RCTs comparing to other typical agents used in headache with similar outcomes
Agitation
Median time to reach “calmness” 8-25 minutes, similar to other treatment options
Loxapine
Newer medication for agitation with onset within 2 minutes
Delivered via inhaler
Efficacy:
Decreased agitation in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder
Decreased time in restraints
Patients and staff both have high satisfaction with drug
Reduced time to disposition, about 3 hours less
Adverse effects: respiratory distress, especially in patients with underlying obstructive lung disease
Albuterol worsens bronchospasm
Limited use to one dose every 24 hours
Dosing: 10 mg
Clinical Decision Making WITH DR. Hill
Study by Pelaccia et al. in 2014 indicated 77% of differential diagnoses were generated by the physician within 5 minutes of talking with a patient
The range of items on the differential diagnosis was 4-8
Immediate hypotheses were based on intuition, while later items were more based on conscious effort
Recognition Primed Decision Making (Klein)
People use their experience to form a repertoire of patterns
Decision making is dependent on matching a scenario to a known pattern
Dual Process Decision Making (Kahneman)
System 1: Fast, subconscious, pattern recognition, can be high capacity, independent of working memory, low mental effort
System 2: Slow, conscious, low capacity, rule based, analytic and reflective
Anchoring
Premature Closure
Representativeness Restraint
Search Satisfying
Sutton’s Slip
Triage-Curing
Unpacking Principle
Vertical Line Failure
Playing the Odds
Omission Bias
Confirmation Bias
Overconfidence
Psych-Out Error
Diagnosis Momentum
NIHSS WITH Dr. Knight
Review of appropriate NIHSS calculation
Pointers:
Can do visual velds and visual extinction/neglect testing at the same time
Hold both arms up for them and ask patient to keep up against gravity for 10 seconds
When testing limb ataxia, be sure to make patient fully extend arm and be in the visual field the patient can see
Do not test ataxia in hemiparetic/hemiplegic limb, as does not add to points if ataxic
Ataxia must be out of proportion to weakness
Aphasia can be complex; if patient can describe a pen, but not name “pen,” they still have significant aphasia without dysarhria
Strokes do not cause acute stuttering
Gaze deviation will be deviated toward side of stroke and away from source location of seizure
Deficits from old strokes are included in your NIHSS
NIHSS is insensitive for posterior stroke syndromes and are weighted more toward left-sided stroke syndromes given location of language centers